Publisher: Dark Horse
(April 29, 2009)
Hardcover, 232 pages
“It’s
a bit difficult to consider Herbie volume by volume. After all, each story is
self-contained - there are no ongoing subplots or themes. Each issue is instead
a marvel of cartoon engineering: hermetically sealed entertaining. In fact,
it’s the relentless imagination of writer Richard Hughes and artist Ogden
Whitney that provides the engine here. Both veterans of comic books for almost
three decades, by 1967 the due had written and drawn every conceivable kind of
comic-book story… In Herbie, the duo found the ideal vehicle for their talents,
combining, via Herbie’s godlike powers, all their seemingly favorite themes in
single stories.”
-
Dan Nadel from the introduction.
This
final volume, which took me forever to find at a reasonable price, collects the
final group of issues, 15 - 23. It’s not poor Herbie’s fault that he was
cancelled. His entire publisher, American Comics Group, went belly up a month
after issue 23. In fact, there were rumors of some lost Herbie stories floating
around, but they’ve never been anything but rumors as far as I can tell. Thank
goodness Dark Horse made these archive editions.
Herbie
Popnecker is a squat round boy with coke-bottle glasses and a lollypop
addiction. While simultaneously being irresistible to women, the lollypops give
him special powers to beat foes up, travel through time, etc. Essentially any
power he needs is wrapped up in a lollypop on his special belt- think 1960s
Batman TV show utility belt. His father, on the other hand, is drawn like as a
standard handsome protagonist of comic stories, but is revealed to be stupid,
cowardly, and arrogant, who enjoys bullying his own son. A sort of revenge by
the authors on all the pretty boys jocks from their past.
Humor
books are not unusual for the comic industry (or weren’t unusual), but Herbie
stands apart from them in style. That is, a dead-pan style. Normally I would’ve
thought that it was impossible to achieve in sequential art, but Herbie is a
perfect example of it. Because, while the events in stories are ridiculous
beyond belief, the art is not done in a comic or “wacky” style. Instead it is
drawn straight as it would be for any normal comic. It’s almost bland and casts
the entire Compare the art to any 1960s superhero story and you will see it’s
done as straight-forward as anyone of them. No little comic additions in the
panel, just stark, minimalist art which accentuates the insanity of the
script.
No comments:
Post a Comment