“Scotland
Yard was convinced they had a single killer who murdered two or more victims in
separate events in the Whitechapel and Spitalfields districts in late 1888,
thus Jack the Ripper fits the modern definition of a serial killer. What was
not a consensus in Scotland Yard was which victims were killed by one offender.
All told, there were well over a dozen victims of violent crime in the East End
in the period in question. As in any research discipline, there are groupers
and splitters. Some see the slightest similarities as justification to group
together, while others focus on differences and split the groups apart. There
are even modern researchers who are convinced there was no Jack the Ripper, and
all of the casual prostitutes were murdered by separate offenders. Most experts
agree, however, that the number of Jack the Ripper victims is in the middle,
between four and six.”
This
is an academic book and assumes that the reader already has a certain amount of
knowledge about the Jack the Ripper case, its victims, and the investigation
around it. It is not for someone who is new to the case.
Perhaps
it makes too much of an assumption of pre-knowledge from the reader, because
very little of it deals with the infamous Dr Tumblety in London, except for
the fact that he was there. The book is more of a justification as to why
Tumbletly should be considered as a serious suspect, rather than hard facts
around Jack the Ripper. In fact, it is more interesting if you forget about the
Ripper at all and view it as a character study of a habitual, mentally ill, but
very successful criminal.
"Doctor" Francis Tumbletly |
Tumblety
was an “herb doctor”, ie quack and abortionist in the 19th century with peripheral
ties to the Lincoln and Garfield assassinations. He was a narcissist and we'll
known woman hater- especially towards prostitutes. Many times he is quoted in
official documents as having stated that all such women “should be
disemboweled”, and he owned the surgical tools to do this. Many at Scotland
Yard considered him a likely suspect, even going so far as to send detectives
after him to New York when Tumbletly absconded from London.
The
main reason he has been discounted by many as a credible Ripper suspect is due
to his homosexuality. All homosexual serial killers in the past have mostly
preyed upon young boys. However, the author points out that the Ripper victims
(however many there actually were) are not the victims of a sexual crime. They
were not raped and most of the damage to the bodies was post mortem. Usually
the first thing done to them was to have their throats slit. This indicates
there were not killed for a sexual thrill, but for some other purpose.
Author Michael J. Hawley |
However, bizarre murder was not the standard for Tumblety actions and the author justifies his
assertions with the following points. 1. Tumblety's lifelong hatred for
prostitutes, whom he saw as his sexual rivals for young men.
2.
Tumblety's behavior changed dramatically in the late 1880s. He began to dress
like a homeless drifter and not bathe, despite being the olde-time equivalent
to a millionaire. As his health later deteriorates, with visible facial
lesions, the author speculates that Tumbletly suffered from tertiary stage
syphilis. Violent actions are commonplace for those suffering from it. Look at
some of the actions of Caesar Borgia.
3.
The point of the murders may have been to harvest the organs of the woman in
order to attempt to create the supposed “elixir of life”. There were many
purported magical societies popping up at the time who were attempting to find
this version of the philosopher's stone. As life comes from the vaginal organs,
it was believed that said organs could prolong life.
Obviously
Tumblety failed, his disease grew worse and eventually leading to his death in
1903, but he may have been desperate enough to try. He had the tools, it was
towards a class of person he despised, and was non-sexual in nature. This is a
fascinating book for someone already familiar with the multitude of details in
the Jack the Ripper case.
Hi, This is the author Michael Hawley. I apologize, but there's just one slight correction: My name is Michael L. Hawley, as opposed to Michael J. Hawley. Thanks!
ReplyDeleteHi! Not the blog owner but just wanted to say I’m a fan!
DeleteGreat work!