By George Orwell
Publisher: Penguin Random House (2018)
Softcover, 48 pages.
Amazon Listing
“By ‘nationalism’ I mean first of all the habit of assuming that human beings can be classified like insects and that whole blocks of millions or tens of millions can be confidently labeled as ‘good’ or ‘bad’. But secondly - and this is much more important - I mean the habit of identifying oneself with a single nation or other unit, placing it beyond good and evil and recognizing no other duties than that of advancing its interests. Nationalism is not to be confused with patriotism. Both words are usually used in so vague a way that any definition is liable to be challenged, but one must draw a distinction between them, since two different and even opposing ideas are involved. By patriotism I mean devotion to a particular place and a particular way of life, which one believes to be the best in the world but has no wish to force upon other people. Patriotism is of its nature defensive, both militarily and culturally. Nationalism, on the other hand, is inseparable from the desire for power. The abiding purpose of every nationalist is to secure more power and more prestige, not for himself but for the nation or other unit in which he has chosen to sink his own individuality.”
Publisher: Penguin Random House (2018)
Softcover, 48 pages.
Amazon Listing
“By ‘nationalism’ I mean first of all the habit of assuming that human beings can be classified like insects and that whole blocks of millions or tens of millions can be confidently labeled as ‘good’ or ‘bad’. But secondly - and this is much more important - I mean the habit of identifying oneself with a single nation or other unit, placing it beyond good and evil and recognizing no other duties than that of advancing its interests. Nationalism is not to be confused with patriotism. Both words are usually used in so vague a way that any definition is liable to be challenged, but one must draw a distinction between them, since two different and even opposing ideas are involved. By patriotism I mean devotion to a particular place and a particular way of life, which one believes to be the best in the world but has no wish to force upon other people. Patriotism is of its nature defensive, both militarily and culturally. Nationalism, on the other hand, is inseparable from the desire for power. The abiding purpose of every nationalist is to secure more power and more prestige, not for himself but for the nation or other unit in which he has chosen to sink his own individuality.”
This is a collection of three essays by George Orwell written in
1945 and published originally in the magazines: Polemic, Contemporary
Jewish Record, and Tribune. All of them are additionally collected,
along with a host of others, in Orwell’s Collected Essays. The three
essays, “Notes on Nationalism”, “Antisemitism in Britain” and “The Sporting
Spirit”, have a similar theme. Each is an analysis of the phenomenon
called nationalism.
For the above selection, you can see how Orwell divides
nationalism and separates it from patriotism, but he also discusses an aspect of
nationalism which I find fascinating and relevant to American society
today. That of negative-nationalism, where a person can have a purely negative
attitude towards a society (usually the one they live in) with no positive
feelings towards any other culture or country. While slightly different, this
attitude is just as destructive as pro-nationalist attitude as a person’s main
motivation. The negative-nationalist just wants to destroy anything to do with
a society, to erase and condemn it completely. Often this is the prime motivation
of various Communist\Socialist parties worming their way into positions of
power.
In the second essay, “Antisemitism in Britain”, Orwell discusses
how anti-Jewish sentiment has not dissipated in Britain, but due to the Nazi atrocities
it isn’t discussed anymore. Many people secretly still dislike the Jews, but
would never openly admit it, making “stamping it out” (Orwell’s words)
completely impossible if it hidden.
The last article is rather lighthearted and demonstrates the
tribal nature that people take to one’s sports team, and how often that team is
much more important to people than the politicians about them. He points out
people often treat their chosen political party with the same rah-rah-rah
mentality that they do their football team. It’s not they're winning. It's we’re
winning.
For more readings, try books by Rex Hurst.
No comments:
Post a Comment